Abstract

S235JR steel is used in many applications, but its resistance to the erosion processes has been poorly studied. To investigate this resistance, cavitation, and slurry erosion tests were conducted. These tests were carried out at different erosion intensities, i.e., different flow rates in the cavitation tunnel with a system of barricades and different rotational speeds in the slurry pot. The steel was tested as-received and after thermal treatment at 930 °C, which lowered the hardness of the steel. To better understand the degradation processes, in addition to mass loss measurements, surface roughness and hardness were measured. Along with increasing erosion intensity, the mass loss increased as well. However, the nature of the increase in mass loss, as well as the effect of steel hardness on this mass loss, was different for each of the erosion processes. In the cavitation erosion tests, the mass loss increased linearly with the increase in flow velocity, while in the slurry tests this relationship was polynomial, indicating a strong increase in mass losses with an increase in rotational speed. Cavitation erosion resulted in stronger and deeper strain hardening than slurry. Surface damage from cavitation erosion tests was mainly deep pits, voids, and cracks during the slurry tests, while flaking was the most significant damage.

Highlights

  • IntroductionCavitation erosion and solid particle erosion are the degradation processes that play a significant role in the service life of said devices

  • The initial surface hardness was 178.7 ± 3.5 HV of the specimens used for cavitation erosion test and 151.74 ± 0.86 HV of the specimens used for slurry erosion tests

  • The conducted investigations show that an increase in a flow velocity or a rotational speed increases the mass loss of the S235JR steel, but the nature of this increase is different for each type of erosion

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Cavitation erosion and solid particle erosion are the degradation processes that play a significant role in the service life of said devices. The mentioned degradation processes usually act separately, or one process is dominating. In both destruction processes, the degradation results from repeated impacts, the mass loss and the erosion rate can be substantially different. There is very little research showing differences in the destruction process. For this reason, it is desirable to know the development of material degradation and the resistance of the material to each of the degradation processes mentioned

Objectives
Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call