Abstract
The aim of the study was to evaluate whether the region (internal or external) of the CAD/CAM block influences the mechanical performance of restorative materials. Blocks of different CAD/CAM materials (Composites: KAV – Katana Avencia; LULT – LULT Ultimate; Ceramics: ENAM – Vita Enamic; NICE - N!CE; EMP – IPS Empress CAD; VMII – Vita Mark II; EMAX – IPS e.max CAD) were selected, and direct resin composite blocks (APX - Clearfil AP-X; FSUP - Filtek Supreme) were built using the incremental technique on a mold from one of the CAD/CAM blocks. All blocks were sectioned into bar-shaped specimens (1 × 1 × 14 mm), which were separated into two groups according to the region of the block (inside or outside). 3-point bending tests were performed following ISO 6872:2015 and flexural strength data were analyzed using one-way ANOVA and Bonferroni post-hoc tests (p < 0.05). Weibull module and characteristic strength were also calculated. In general, the mean flexural strength values were not statistically different (p > 0.05) between the inside and outside regions of each material, except for LULT (inside > outside) and EMAX (outside > inside). Comparing the materials, a similar strength (only discrete variations) was observed for inside, outside or merged (inside and outside data assembled together) regions: EMAX > KAV = LULT > NICE = APX > EMP = ENAM = VMII ≥ FSUP (merged condition). Characteristic strength at 63.2% failure probability and at 5% failure probability generally corroborates such observations. There were no statistical differences for Weibull module data (inside, outside, or merged), except for KAV and NICE (outside > inside). Thus, the region from where the restoration is milled within the CAD/CAM block generally does not influence the mechanical performance hereof (flexural strength, failure probability, risk of premature failures, and mechanical reliability) of the material, except for LULT and EMAX.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callMore From: Journal of the Mechanical Behavior of Biomedical Materials
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
