Effect of the measurement of the work of breathing on the respiratory outcome of preterms

Abstract

Rationale There are no validated criteria for the choice of the optimal type of noninvasive respiratory support (NRS) and most appropriate settings in preterms. Methods The work of breathing (WOB) during oxygen (O2) alone, nasal continuous positive pressure (nCPAP) and high flow nasal cannula (HFNC) was compared in preterm babies (23–30 weeks’ gestation, “physiological group”) needing any type of noninvasive respiratory support (“baseline” NRS) at 4 weeks of life. Babies were thereafter treated with the NRS associated with the greatest reduction in WOB (“optimal NRS”). The respiratory outcome at 36 weeks” gestation of these babies was compared to a “control” group treated with NRS based on standard noninvasive parameters. Preterm babies were prospectively enrolled in 3 centers and randomized into the “physiological” or “control” group. Results Thirty babies were randomized. WOB with “baseline” NRS was higher than the “optimal” NRS and the consequent NRS chosen by physicians (p = 0.001). WOB was lower during HFNC than during O2 (p = 0.032) but WOB was comparable between nCPAP and HFNC, and between nCPAP and O2. Notably, WOB was near to normal during spontaneous breathing with O2. Respiratory outcome at 36 week’ gestation was comparable between the 2 groups. Conclusion The optimization of NRS by means of the measurement of WOB in preterms requiring any type of NRS at 4 weeks of life was able to decrease the WOB but had no effect on the clinical outcome at 36 weeks’ gestation.