Abstract

The mechanism of the protective effect of ursodeoxycholic acid in cholestatic liver diseases remains unclear. Since there is evidence that alterations in the pericanalicular actin microfilament network play a major role in cholestasis, the aims of this study were (a) to determine the effect of the cholestatic agents, taurolithocholate (TLC) and erythromycin estolate (ERY), on F-actin distribution in isolated rat hepatocyte couplets and (b) to assess the effect of tauroursodeoxycholate (TUDC) and taurocholate on the modifications induced by these two compounds. F-actin was stained with fluorescein-isothiocyanate phalloidin and fluorimetric measurements were performed using a scanning laser cytometer ACAS 570. F-actin distribution was assessed in the couplets by the ratio of the pericanalicular area fluorescence/total couplet fluorescence (CF/TF). At non-cytotoxic concentrations, TLC (50, 100 microM) and ERY (10, 50, 100 microM) induced a significant accumulation of F-actin around the bile canaliculus as indicated by increased fluorescence in the pericanalicular area and by the increased CF/TF ratio compared with the controls. Electron microscopy studies showed significant alterations in bile canaliculi microvilli in couplets treated with 100 microM TLC. Only a few canaliculi showed an increase in pericanalicular microfilaments after treatment with 100 microM ERY. As assessed by scanning laser cytometry, TUDC prevented changes in F-actin distribution when it was added to the medium with taurolithocholate or erythromycin estolate at equimolar concentrations. However, the morphological changes observed by electron microscopy after treatment with TLC were not modified by co-treatment with TUDC. Taurocholate was ineffective. We conclude that (a) abnormalities of pericanalicular F-actin microfilaments occur in two different models of cholestasis, (b) tauroursodeoxycholate prevents the accumulation of pericanalicular F-actin detected by scanning laser cytometry but not the morphological changes of the canaliculus observed by electronic microscopy. Therefore, in these experimental conditions, the protective effect of TUDC appears to be partial.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call