Abstract
AbstractBlends of isotactic polypropylene (PP) and syndiotactic polystyrene (sPS) with and without β‐nucleating agent were prepared using a twin‐screw extruder at 290 °C. Blends of PP/sPS with β‐nucleating agent mainly show β crystalline form, irrespective of high (20 °C min−1) or low (2 °C min−1) previous cooling rates. This suggests that the cooling rates have little effect on the polymorphic composition of PP in PP/sPS blends. The effect of sPS on the crystallization of PP is compared with that of polyamide 6 (PA6). The increase in crystallization temperature of PP is smaller in the presence of sPS than in the presence of PA6; the fold surface free energy of PP/sPS is larger than that of PP/PA6 blends. These results reveal that compared with PA6, sPS has much weaker α‐nucleation effect on the crystallization of PP. The weak α‐nucleation effect of sPS is attributed to the high lattice mismatch between PP and sPS crystals.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
