Abstract

The Bychkov model of ultrafast flame acceleration in obstructed tubes [Valiev et al., “Flame Acceleration in Channels with Obstacles in the Deflagration-to-Detonation Transition,” Combust. Flame 157, 1012 (2010)] employed a number of simplifying assumptions, including those of free-slip and adiabatic surfaces of the obstacles and of the tube wall. In the present work, the influence of free-slip/non-slip surface conditions on the flame dynamics in a cylindrical tube of radius R, involving an array of parallel, tightly-spaced obstacles of size αR, is scrutinized by means of the computational simulations of the axisymmetric fully-compressible gasdynamics and combustion equations with an Arrhenius chemical kinetics. Specifically, non-slip and free-slip surfaces are compared for the blockage ratio, α, and the spacing between the obstacles, ΔZ, in the ranges 1/3 ≤ α ≤ 2/3 and 0.25 ≤ ΔZ/R ≤ 2.0, respectively. For these parameters, an impact of surface friction on flame acceleration is shown to be minor, only 1∼4%, slightly facilitating acceleration in a tube with ΔZ/R = 0.5 and moderating acceleration in the case of ΔZ/R = 0.25. Given the fact that the physical boundary conditions are non-slip as far as the continuum assumption is valid, the present work thereby justifies the Bychkov model, employing the free-slip conditions, and makes its wider applicable to the practical reality. While this result can be anticipated and explained by a fact that flame propagation is mainly driven by its spreading in the unobstructed portion of an obstructed tube (i.e. far from the tube wall), the situation is, however, qualitatively different from that in the unobstructed tubes, where surface friction modifies the flame dynamics conceptually.

Highlights

  • Among the geometries associated with fast flame acceleration and the deflagration-to-detonation transition (DDT) scenarios,1–9 obstructed cylindrical tubes provide fastest acceleration.10 While flame propagation through the obstacles is oftentimes associated with turbulence or shocks11 or hydraulic resistance,12 Bychkov et al.13–16 identified a conceptually laminar, shockless mechanism of ultrafast acceleration in semi-open channels or cylindrical tubes equipped with a comb-shaped array of obstacles

  • Given the fact that the physical boundary conditions are non-slip as far as the continuum assumption is valid, the present work thereby justifies the Bychkov model, employing the free-slip conditions, and makes its wider applicable to the practical reality. While this result can be anticipated and explained by a fact that flame propagation is mainly driven by its spreading in the unobstructed portion of an obstructed tube, the situation is, qualitatively different from that in the unobstructed tubes, where surface friction modifies the flame dynamics conceptually

  • This result certifies a minor impact of the free-slip/non-slip boundary conditions and thereby justifies the Bychkov model of flame acceleration scitation.org/journal/adv in obstructed pipes, which employs the free-slip surfaces of obstacles and walls

Read more

Summary

INTRODUCTION

Among the geometries associated with fast flame acceleration and the deflagration-to-detonation transition (DDT) scenarios, obstructed cylindrical tubes provide fastest acceleration. While flame propagation through the obstacles is oftentimes associated with turbulence or shocks or hydraulic resistance, Bychkov et al. identified a conceptually laminar, shockless mechanism of ultrafast acceleration in semi-open channels or cylindrical tubes equipped with a comb-shaped array of obstacles. While flame propagation through the obstacles is oftentimes associated with turbulence or shocks or hydraulic resistance, Bychkov et al. identified a conceptually laminar, shockless mechanism of ultrafast acceleration in semi-open channels or cylindrical tubes equipped with a comb-shaped array of obstacles. It was shown that both surface friction and thermal (cold and hot) wall conditions play an enormous role in unobstructed pipes. Will it be the case in the obstructed ones? While Ugarte et al. have recently shown a minor effect of the outer isothermal walls as compared to the adiabatic ones, in obstructed pipes; in the present work we have compared slip and nonslip surfaces and came to the same conclusion

NUMERICAL METHOD
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
CONCLUSIONS
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call