Abstract
It has been reported by Groschke and Evans (1950) that the injection of aureomycin, by McGinnis et al. (1950) of aureomycin or streptomycin, by Whitehill et al. (1950) of aureomycin or penicillin, did not result in a growth response in chicks. However, Elam et al. (1951 a, b, c) reported that injection of penicillin or bacitracin, but not aureomycin, stimulated growth in chicks. Dixon and Thayer (1951) reported that injection of penicillin or aureomycin gave a growth response equal to or greater than that resulting from oral administration. Stephenson (1951) found that injected bacitracin gave a growth response in chicks. Coates et al. (1952) also obtained a growth response from injected penicillin as great as obtained by oral administration. Becker et al. (1951) obtained a growth response in pigs by injection of penicillin.In view of the finding of Noland et al. (1952) that subcutaneous implantation into pigs, at the .
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
