Abstract

The comparative assessment of the experimental and computational methods for detecting the quantity of frozen-out water proposed by V. Zhadan, V. Latyshev, J. Nagаоka, L. Riedel, D. Ryutov and G. Chizhov as applied to beef in the temperature range of –1°С to –30 °С was carried out. It was shown that the values of frozen-out water proportion detected by the formula of J. Nagаоka were 6–7% higher than the experimental data of L.Riedel in a temperature range of –7 °С to –30 °С. With decrease of the meat temperature from –7 °С to –30 °С, the difference in the experimental data obtained by L.Riedel and V. Latyshev reaches 5%. The values corresponding to the most reliable experimental data of L. Riedel for beef (tcr = –0,95 °С), which were adopted in the recommendations of the International Institute of Refrigeration (IIR), are most accurately described by the theoretical dependence proposed by D. Rutov. Using this dependence, the quantity of frozenout water in a temperature range of –1°С to –4 °С was detected as applied to NOR and DFD meat. It was established that at a difference of the cryoscopic temperature of 0,3 °С between two groups of meat, the ice content at a temperature of –2 °С is 13,0% higher in DFD meat compared to NOR meat, and in order to ensure the same content of frozen-out water (30%), the storage temperature for NOR meat should be 0,5 °С lower than that for DFD meat.

Highlights

  • In preserving products of animal origin in the fresh condition, the aim has been the maximum decrease in an object temperature that prevents the crystal formation

  • Thermo-hygrogram of the near- and subcryoscopic meat storage regimes in the experimental storage rooms LG R-K182FR Рис. 1а

  • The comparative analysis of the different methods for detecting the quantity of frozen-out water in beef that are used in Russia was carried out

Read more

Summary

Introduction

In preserving products of animal origin in the fresh condition, the aim has been the maximum decrease in an object temperature that prevents the crystal formation. As practice shows, this cooling does not retard sufficiently the development of the enzymatic and microbiological processes and does not ensure preservation of product quality for a long period of time. Возможность применения субкриоскопической температуры для сохранения пищевых продуктов в сверхохлажденном состоянии отмечается и в настоящее время [4,5,6,7,8]. Сверхохлаждение определяется как технология, при которой температура продуктов понижается на 1–2 °С ниже точки криоскопической температуры продукта. Определяющим качество сверхохлажденного продукта, является степень перехода воды в лёд (от 5 до 50%)

Objectives
Methods
Results
Conclusion

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.