Abstract

This study aims to analyze the effect of SPM and management of audit risk on audit quality. The sampling technique uses purposive sampling, with the criteria of auditors working in KAP in Semarang and at least one year working. The findings of this study are aspects of SPM that have a positive effect on audit quality are independence, personal assignments, supervision, employment, promotion, acceptance and client sustainability. Whereas consultation, professional development, and inspection have no effect on audit quality. The three aspects of risk management (inherent risk, risk control, and detection risk) do not affect audit quality.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call