Abstract
It has been suggested that work-of-fracture, which quantifies the ability of a material to resist fracture, is dependent on specimen size. This experiment compared work-of-fracture, calculated as energy per unit area, for different specimen sizes of Plexiglas ®, bovine tibial bone and aluminum. Three different geometrically similar cross sections were tested for each material for a total of 54 specimens. Work-of-fracture was measured by loading a notched beam (triangular cross section) in three-point bending at a constant deformation rate. The energy necessary to cause fracture was measured from a load-deformation curve. Specimen fracture area was determined using macrophotography. Atomic absorption spectrophotometry was used to determine weight percent calcium of bone specimens and quantitative light microscopy was used to determine fractional void area. Analysis of variance showed no effect of specimen size on work-of-fracture for aluminum or Plexiglas speciments ( p > 0.05). A significant difference was found, however, between the large (area = 11.7 ± 1.9 mm 2) and small (area = 3.48 ± 0.68 mm 2) bone specimens and between the medium (area = 5.89 ± 0.69 mm 2) and small (area = 3.48 ± 0.68 mm 2) bone specimens. No correlation was found between work-of-fracture and either calcium content ( r 2 = 0.128) or fractional void area ( r 2 = 0.0713). The mean work-of-fracture values found are as follows: aluminum, 59.8 ± 13.7 kJ m −2; Plexiglas, 0.620 ± 0.074 kJ m −2; bone (area 5.89 ± 0.69 mm 2−11.7 ± 1.9 mm 2), 9.72 ± 1.93 kJ m −2 and bone (area 3.48 ± 0.68 mm 2), 5.48 ± 1.79 kJ m −2.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have