Abstract

Smoking is associated with an increased chance of developing lung cancer. Three causal inference methods, backdoor adjustment, front-door adjustment, and counterfactual are used to analyze observational data on smoking, lung cancer, and related risks factors. Backdoor adjustment fails to allow for possible presence of unobserved confounders, which is merited by front-door adjustment. Counterfactual harnesses individual patient statistics to establish causal relationships between smoking and cancer on the individual level, so as to evaluate lung cancer risks after changes in individual smoking habits. Results by different methodology are in good agreement and showcase a strong causation between smoking and lung cancer at both group and individual level.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.