Abstract
A single center, single surgeon, randomized, prospective clinical trial was performed comparing the effectiveness of small (3.5 mm to 4.0 mm) incision intraocular lens surgery and a larger (6.0 mm) incision in improving uncorrected visual acuity and reducing postoperative inflammation and surgically induced astigmatism. One hundred twelve eligible unilateral cases were randomized to receive a 3.5 mm to 4.0 mm incision with implantation of an Allergan Medical Optics three-piece SI-18NB silicone lens (56 cases) or a 6.0 mm incision with implantation of a three-piece biconvex poly(methyl methacrylate) lens (56 cases). At one day after surgery, significantly (P <.01) more patients with 3.5 mm incisions had 20/40 or better uncorrected visual acuity than patients with 6.0 mm incisions (45% vs 20%). Forty percent of patients with 6.0 mm incisions vs 14% of patients with 3.5 mm incisions had visual acuities of 20/100 or worse. At one day after surgery, the larger incision group had significantly higher (P < .01) mean keratometric cylinder (2.28 diopters vs 1.28 diopters in the small incision group). The two groups were comparable by three months. Laser flare/cell meter measurements were taken for each group but showed no significant differences in mean flare or cell measurements between the groups.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
