Abstract
Phase composition and microstructures of SiC ceramics with Al2O3 and Er2O3 as sintering additives were compared, which were prepared by pressureless liquid-phase sintering (PLPS), hot pressing sintering (HPS), and spark plasma sintering (SPS), respectively. Despite the different sintering temperatures and pressures, all samples were almost fully densified and exhibited fine-grained microstructure. Only SiC crystallized phase was detected in the SPS SiC because of the low sintering temperature and high cooling rate, while the ErAlO3 phase accompanied with a designed Er3Al5O12 phase was detected in the HPS SiC because of the absence of powder bed, which led to partial volatilization of Al2O3 powder at a higher sintering temperature. No obvious orientational growth of SiC grains was observed in all these ceramics, except a few 4H SiC grains along <100> axis in the SPS SiC. In addition, SiC–SiC grain boundary films differed from each other in these SiC ceramics.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
