Abstract

Asimultaneous integrated boost (SIB) may result in increased out-of-field (DOOF) and photoneutron (HPN) doses in volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) for prostate cancer (PCA). This work therefore aimed to compare DOOF and HPN in flattened (FLAT) and flattening filter-free (FFF) 6‑MV and 10-MV VMAT treatment plans with and without SIB. Eight groups of 30VMAT plans for PCA with 6MV or 10MV, with or without FF and with uniform (2 Gy) or SIB target dose (2.5/3.0 Gy) prescriptions (CONV, SIB), were generated. All 240 plans were delivered on aslab-phantom and compared with respect to measured DOOF and HPN in 61.8 cm distance from the isocenter. The 6‑and 10-MV flattened VMAT plans with conventional fractionation (6-and 10-MV FLAT CONV) served as standard reference groups. Doses were analyzed as afunction of delivered monitor units (MU) and weighted equivalent square field size Aeq. Pearson's correlation coefficients between the presented quantities were determined. The SIB plans resulted in decreased HPN over an entire prostate RT treatment course (10-MV SIB vs. CONV -38.2%). Omission of the flattening filter yielded less HPN (10-MV CONV -17.2%; 10-MV SIB -22.5%). The SIB decreased DOOF likewise by 39% for all given scenarios, while the FFF mode reduced DOOF on average by 60%. Astrong Pearson correlation was found between MU and HPN (r > 0.9) as well as DOOF (0.7 < r < 0.9). For acomplete treatment, SIB reduces both photoneutron and OOF doses to almost the same extent as FFF deliveries. It is recommended to apply moderately hypofractionated 6‑MV SIB FFF-VMAT when considering photoneutron or OOF doses.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call