Abstract

Using 12 gilts (initial body weight: 38.4±1.1kg), we investigated an effect of early dietary amino acid (AA) restrictions on daily changes in urinary N excretion and growth performance during the following re-alimentation period. After the 10-d preliminary period of using a high-protein diet, we estimated protein deposition rate (PD) of pigs, two 14-d experimental periods followed. Pigs were allotted to 2 groups so as the mean PD of both groups was similar. During the first 14-d restriction period, the control group was fed an AA adequate diet, while the restricted group was fed an AA deficient diet. During the following 14-d re-alimentation period, both groups were fed AA adequate diet. Starting on d 12 of the restricted period, samples of urine were collected from both groups using permanent bladder catheters to monitor daily N excretion. Pigs were weighed weekly, the remaining feed were collected daily, and average daily feed intake (ADFI), average daily gain (ADG), gain:feed (G:F) were calculated for each period separately and overall for the restriction and re-alimentation periods. For the same periods, urinary N excretion rate was determined. During the re-alimentation period, pigs that were previously fed the AA deficient diet tended (P=0.060) to have greater ADFI (2297 vs. 2171g/d), and greater (P<0.05) ADG (1216 vs. 827g/d) and G:F (529 vs. 379g/kg) than the control group. There were no differences in urinary N excretion between the restricted (20.8g/d) and control (21.2g/d) groups. During the overall period, lower (P<0.05) ADG (643 vs. 817g/d) and G:F (294 vs. 381g/kg) were observed in the restricted group compared with the control group. There was lower urinary N excretion in the restricted group in comparison to the control group as a result of early dietary AA restrictions. After early dietary AA restrictions, pigs demonstrated compensatory response in growth performance, but reduction in urinary N excretion was observed for only a short-term. During the overall period, including the restriction and re-alimentation period, compensatory growth was not observed, and lower urinary N excretion was resulted from early dietary AA restrictions. Compensatory response was not strong enough to offset the differences caused by severe early dietary AA restrictions.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call