Abstract

Colonoscopy and fecal immunochemical testing (FIT) are considered top-tier tests for colorectal cancer (CRC) screening. Behavioral economic insights about "choice architecture" suggest that participation could be influenced by how people are presented test options. To investigate response rates for offering colonoscopy only compared with sequential choice (colonoscopy and then FIT) or active choice (colonoscopy or FIT) through mailed outreach. Three-arm pragmatic randomized clinical trial conducted between November 14, 2017, and May 14, 2018. The setting was primary care practices at an academic health system. Patients aged 50 to 74 years with at least 2 primary care visits in the 2-year preenrollment period were included if they were eligible but not up to date on CRC screening. Eligible patients received mailed outreach about CRC screening. Equal numbers of eligible patients were randomly assigned to 3 outreach groups to receive mailings about CRC screening with the following options: (1) direct phone number to call for scheduling colonoscopy (colonoscopy only), (2) direct phone number to call for colonoscopy and a mailed FIT kit if no response within 4 weeks (sequential choice), or (3) direct phone number to call for colonoscopy and a mailed FIT kit offered at the same time (active choice). The primary outcome was CRC screening completion (FIT or colonoscopy) within 4 months of initial outreach. The secondary outcomes were CRC screening completion within 6 months of outreach and the choice of colonoscopy as a screening test. In total, 438 patients were included in the intent-to-treat analysis, with a median age of 56 years (interquartile range, 52-63 years); 55.0% were women. At 4 months, the CRC screening completion rates were 14.4% (95% CI, 8.7%-20.1%) in the colonoscopy-only arm, 17.1% (95% CI, 11.0%-23.2%) in the sequential choice arm, and 19.9% (95% CI, 13.4%-26.4%) in the active choice arm. Neither choice arm achieved a screening rate statistically greater than that in the colonoscopy-alone arm. Among those who completed CRC screening at 4 months, 90.5% (95% CI, 78.0%-103.0%) chose colonoscopy in the colonoscopy-only arm, which was significantly higher than the 52.0% (95% CI, 32.4%-71.6%; P = .005) and 37.9% (95% CI, 20.2%-55.6%; P < .001) in the sequential choice and active choice arms, respectively. There was no significant increase in CRC screening when offering sequential or active choice, but there was a lower rate of colonoscopy in the choice arms than in the colonoscopy-only arm. Subtle changes in sequencing or defaults can alter patient decision making related to preventive health. ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT03246438.

Highlights

  • At 4 months, the colorectal cancer (CRC) screening completion rates were 14.4% in the colonoscopy-only arm, 17.1% in the sequential choice arm, and 19.9% in the active choice arm

  • Neither choice arm achieved a screening rate statistically greater than that in the colonoscopyalone arm. Among those who completed CRC screening at 4 months, 90.5% chose colonoscopy in the colonoscopy-only arm, which was significantly higher than the 52.0% and 37.9% in the sequential choice and active choice arms, respectively

  • There was no significant increase in CRC screening when offering sequential or active choice, but there was a lower rate of colonoscopy in the choice arms than in the

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Screening is an effective preventive intervention for reducing the risk of death from colorectal cancer (CRC), but uptake is suboptimal despite considerable efforts.[1,2,3,4,5] Colonoscopy and fecal immunochemical testing (FIT) are both considered top-tier tests according to recent guidelines.[6,7,8] Mailing FIT directly to patients’ homes has been shown to boost CRC screening rates,[9,10,11,12,13] but it requires annual outreach to be effective, while colonoscopy may be needed only every 10 years. Behavioral economic insights about “choice architecture” suggest that screening participation could be influenced by how the choices are presented to patients.[19,20,21,22,23] Conventional thinking implies that giving patients a choice of screening options allows them to align screening with their preferences. This would suggest that greater choice is always preferable for patients. We investigated response rates for offering colonoscopy only compared with sequential choice (colonoscopy and FIT) or active choice (colonoscopy or FIT) through mailed outreach

Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call