Abstract

Objective:The study aimed to assess the effect of self-directed learning on knowledge acquisition (first and second exam) among undergraduate nursing students at Albaha University.Methods:A quasi-experimental design was used to compare two unequal groups of nursing students in Albaha University. A convenience sampling technique was used to select the undergraduate nursing students at Al-Baha, Saudi Arabia during the 2014/2015 academic year. Students (n= 65) were recruited through an on-campus advertisement campaign either to register in traditional subjects or self-directed learning subjects. The selected students were assigned to an experimental group (23 students) and a comparison group (42 students) according to their interests. Both groups received same topics by either traditional or self-directed learning. Students’ knowledge acquisition was assessed through exams. Data was analysed by Statistical Package for the Social Sciences, version 20.Results:The results of students in pediatric nursing were (60.2% and 67.3%) in the first exam in traditional learning and self-learning respectively. The students’ scores in the second exam were (57.4% and 70%) in traditional learning and self-learning respectively (p= 0.03). In the first exam of medical-surgical nursing II, the students scored 29.6% in comparison group and 40% in the experimental group (p= 0.025). In the second exam of medical-surgical nursing II, the students scored (35.2% and 51.4%) in the comparison and experimental groups respectively. In the first exam of medical-surgical nursing I, the students scored (50% and 61.6%) in comparison and experimental groups respectively (p= 0.04). In the second exam of medical-surgical nursing I, the students scored(61% and 65.6%) in the comparison and experimental groups respectively. Conclusion: Self-learning was found to be better than traditional learning for nursing students in Albaha University. Therefore, the study findings are useful to improve nursing curricula.

Highlights

  • The latest report on Saudi nursing showed that the number of Saudi nurses increased to 22% of the total nursing workforce in 2008 compared to 9% in 1996

  • In the second exam of pediatric nursing, the students scored 57.4% in the comparison group compared to 70% in the experimental group with a significant difference (p = 0.03)

  • In the first exam of medical-surgical nursing II, the students scored 29.6% in the comparison group compared to 40% in the experimental group with a significant difference (p = 0.025)

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The latest report on Saudi nursing showed that the number of Saudi nurses increased to 22% of the total nursing workforce in 2008 compared to 9% in 1996. In spite of the expanding enthusiasm for enrolment in distinctive nursing instruction programs, it has been evaluated that it could take 25 years to educate enough Saudi nurses with the goal of meeting 30% of the Kingdom's nursing workforce requirements [1]. Out of the 15 Saudi male understudies enlisted, all had primary school readiness involving 6 years of education and were admitted to a 1-year program. Another two Health Institute Programs, one in Riyadh and one in Jeddah, the biggest seaport and business hub, opened to enlist Saudi women [2]. Men and women who later graduated from these Health Institutes were named as medical attendants' assistants [3]

Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call