Abstract

To evaluate the effect of combining 5% hydrofluoric acid (HF) and silane (SI) with the self-etching ceramic primer on the immediate and after 1-year of water storage on bonding efficacy, conditioning pattern (CP) and chemical interaction (CI) to the lithium disilicate. A total of 16 CAD/CAM blocks of lithium disilicate (LD) were cut into four square sections (n=64). For bonding efficacy evaluation, the LD specimens were divided into 4 groups (n=10): 1) HF+SI; 2) self-etching ceramic primer (MEP); 3) HF+MEP; 4) MEP+SI. After each treatment, an adhesive system was applied and Tygon matrices were filled with a dual-cured resin cement followed by light curing. Cylinder specimens (0.8 mmx0.5mm) were stored in water (37 °C for 24 h or 1-year) and submitted to the μSBS test (2-way ANOVA and Tukey's test; a=0.05). CP and CI were only evaluated qualitatively. No significant difference on the μSBS was observed between groups (p=0.73), but reduced μSBS was observed after 1-year of water storage (p>0.0001). After application of HF+SI and MEP, reduction in a number of siloxane bonds was observed, suggesting the coupling of SI on the LD surface. HF or HF+MEP produced a higher dissolution of the glassy matrix than the use of MEP alone. The MEP can be an alternative to traditional ceramic treatment once the chemical interaction and long-term bond strength were similar between both groups. The association of hydrofluoric acid or silane with a self-etching ceramic primer did not add any benefits in terms of chemical interaction and bonding stability.

Highlights

  • Recent improvements in the mechanical properties of lithium disilicate made it one of the most common materials for fabrication of indirect restoration in dental practice [1]

  • Forty were used for microshear bond strength testing, 12 specimens were used for evaluation of chemical interaction of Monobond Etch & Primer (MEP) with the ceramic surface by Raman spectroscopy and 12 specimens were used for etching pattern

  • Microshear Bond Strength Forty bonded cylinders were tested for each experimental group and none of them showed any pretesting failures or were discarded because of porosities or other defects

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Recent improvements in the mechanical properties of lithium disilicate made it one of the most common materials for fabrication of indirect restoration in dental practice [1]. Achieve a good bonding during luting protocols is of paramount importance for the success of indirect lithium disilicate restorations [4]. For lithium disilicate, the micromechanical interlock is created after conditioning with hydrofluoric acid by the selective glass matrix removal, promoting an increase of the ceramic roughness and more surface energy, followed of the silane application to promote a bifunctional and durable adhesion [5]. Hydrofluoric acid is the suggested pretreatment for lithium disilicate restorations, this etchant is toxic [6] and depending on the concentration and etching time may weaken the ceramic surface [7]. There is no consensus on HF concentration and etching time in the literature, as such, variables vary across the published literature [8]

Objectives
Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call