Abstract
Delay discounting is the loss of the subjective value of an outcome as the time to its delivery increases. It has been suggested that organisms can become more tolerant of this delay when engaging in schedule-induced behaviors. Schedule-induced behaviors are those that develop at a high rate during intermittent reinforcement schedules without the need of arranged contingency to the reinforcer, and they have been considered as a model of compulsivity. There is evidence that relates compulsivity to greater delay discounting. The rate of delay discounting represents how impulsive the subject is, as the rate of discounting increases the higher the impulsivity. Thus, the main purpose of this study was to undertake a preliminary evaluation of whether developing schedule-induced behaviors affects performance in a delay-discounting task, by comparing spontaneously hypertensive rats (SHRs) and Wistar–Kyoto (WKY) rats. The rats were exposed to a task that consisted of presenting the subjects with two levers: one produced a small, immediate food reinforcer while the other one produced a larger, delayed reinforcer. During Condition A, the levers were presented, and a water bottle and a running wheel were available in the conditioning chambers; during Condition B, only the levers were presented. SHR and WKY rats developed schedule-induced behaviors during Condition A and showed no difference in discounting rates, contradicting previous reports. Lick allocation during response-reinforcer delays and the inter-trial interval (ITI) showed, respectively, pre- and post-food distributions. Discounting rates during Condition B (when rats could not engage in schedule-induced behaviors) did not reach statistical significance difference among strains of animals, although it was observed a tendency for WKY to behave more self-controlled. Likewise it was not found any effect of schedule-induced behavior on discounting rates, however, a tendency for WKY rats to behave more impulsive during access to drink and run seems to tentatively support the idea of schedule-induced behavior as a model of compulsivity in those rats, being impulsivity simply defined as an excess in behavior.
Highlights
Impulsive behavior is seen in everyday life, but the nature of this heterogeneous concept means that there is no consensus on its definition
No statistical differences were obtained, it can be observed that spontaneously hypertensive rats (SHRs) tended to behave slightly less impulsively during Condition A in comparison to Condition B, while WKY rats behaved more impulsively during Condition A
The analysis revealed a main effect for bin (F(2,18) = 9.262, p < 0.002, η = 0.481) and for the interaction bin × strain (F(2,18) = 4.465, p < 0.031, η = 0.309), but not a main effect of strain (F(1,10) = 2.229, p = 0.166, η = 0.182)
Summary
Impulsive behavior is seen in everyday life, but the nature of this heterogeneous concept means that there is no consensus on its definition. Impulsivity has been operationally defined in animal behavior research as a preference for smaller immediate reinforcers over large delayed ones (Fox et al, 2008; Hamilton et al, 2015), as an aversion to the delay (Sonuga-Barke et al, 1992; Richards et al, 2011), or as the inability to wait or to withhold a response (Richards et al, 2011). The operational definition of impulsivity seems to be heterogeneous as well, Sosa and dos Santos (2019) argue that different paradigms study the same behavioral tendency. Impulsivity has been studied using different standardized intertemporal choice procedures, like the simple- and adjustingdelay discounting tasks (Sosa and dos Santos, 2019). One of the advantages of using standardized procedures is that they facilitate the comparison of analogous behaviors across species (Richards et al, 2011), in some cases standardization is reduced due to methodological changes associated with accommodating the procedures to various species (Sjoberg, 2017)
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.