Abstract

BackgroundThe effect of chronic ischemic scar on repolarization is unclear, with conflicting results from human and animal studies. An improved understanding of electrical remodeling within scar and border zone tissue may enhance substrate-guided ablation techniques for treatment of ventricular tachycardia. Computational modeling studies have suggested increased dispersion of repolarization during epicardial, but not endocardial, left ventricular pacing, in close proximity to scar. However, the effect of endocardial pacing near scar in vivo is unknown.ObjectiveThe purpose of this study was to investigate the effect of scar and pacing location on local repolarization in a porcine myocardial infarction model.MethodsSix model pigs underwent late gadolinium enhancement cardiac magnetic resonance (LGE-CMR) imaging followed by electroanatomic mapping of the left ventricular endocardium. LGE-CMR images were registered to the anatomic shell and scar defined by LGE. Activation recovery intervals (ARIs), a surrogate for action potential duration, and local ARI gradients were calculated from unipolar electrograms within areas of late gadolinium enhancement (aLGE) and healthy myocardium.ResultsThere was no significant difference between aLGE and healthy myocardium in mean ARI (304.20 ± 19.44 ms vs 300.59 ± 19.22 ms; P = .43), ARI heterogeneity (23.32 ± 11.43 ms vs 24.85 ± 12.99 ms; P = .54), or ARI gradients (6.18 ± 2.09 vs 5.66 ± 2.32 ms/mm; P = .39). Endocardial pacing distance from scar did not affect ARI gradients.ConclusionOur findings suggest that changes in ARI are not an intrinsic property of surviving myocytes within scar, and endocardial pacing close to scar does not affect local repolarization.

Highlights

  • Ischemic heart disease is the leading cause of premature death worldwide.[1]

  • We investigated the differences in activation recovery intervals (ARI) and local repolarization gradients between areas of late gadolinium enhancement and healthy myocardium during right ventricular (RV)

  • There were no significant differences in mean ARI, ARI heterogeneity or local ARI gradients in either areas of late gadolinium enhancement (aLGE) or healthy myocardium when RV and left ventricular (LV) pacing were compared

Read more

Summary

Methods

Six model pigs underwent late-gadolinium enhancement cardiac magnetic resonance CMR) imaging followed by electro-anatomical mapping of the left ventricular endocardium. LGE-CMR images were registered to the anatomical shell and scar defined by LGE. Activation recovery intervals (ARI), a surrogate for action potential duration, and local ARI gradients were calculated from unipolar electrograms within areas of LGE (aLGE) and healthy myocardium

Results
Conclusion
Introduction
Discussion
Limitations
Conclusions
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call