Abstract

It is well-known that introductory physics students often have alternative conceptions that are inconsistent with established physical principles and concepts. Invoking alternative conceptions in quantitative problem-solving process can derail the entire process. In order to help students solve quantitative problems involving strong alternative conceptions correctly, appropriate scaffolding support can be helpful. The goal of this study is to examine how different scaffolding supports involving analogical problem solving influence introductory physics students' performance on a target quantitative problem in a situation where many students' solution process is derailed due to alternative conceptions. Three different scaffolding supports were designed and implemented in calculus-based and algebra-based introductory physics courses to evaluate the level of scaffolding needed to help students learn from an analogical problem that is similar in the underlying principles but for which the problem solving process is not derailed by alternative conceptions. We found that for the quantitative problem involving strong alternative conceptions, simply guiding students to work through the solution of the analogical problem first was not enough to help most students discern the similarity between the two problems. However, if additional scaffolding supports that directly helped students examine and repair their knowledge elements involving alternative conceptions were provided, students were more likely to discern the underlying similarities between the problems and avoid getting derailed by alternative conceptions when solving the targeted problem. We also found that some scaffolding supports were more effective in the calculus-based course than in the algebra-based course. This finding emphasizes the fact that appropriate scaffolding support must be determined via research in order to be effective.

Highlights

  • Helping students become adept at both quantitative and qualitative problem-solving is an important goal of many physics courses [1,2]

  • This paper describes an investigation along these lines in a quantitative problem-solving task and examines the effect of different scaffolding supports provided to students

  • We examine the effects of using analogical problem-solving and different scaffolding supports to help 410 introductory physics students in algebrabased and calculus-based courses solve a problem that typically involves a strong alternative conception

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Helping students become adept at both quantitative and qualitative problem-solving is an important goal of many physics courses [1,2]. In order to solve a problem appropriately, students must identify the physics concept(s) and principle(s) relevant to the problem, and apply their knowledge in an appropriate manner to reach the targeted goal. Research suggests that many students have alternative conceptions in physics that are different from the scientifically established ones [3,4,5,6,7,8,9]. These conceptions may come from students’ interpretation of their past experiences [10], and they can influence students’ learning of the scientifically established concepts.

Objectives
Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call