Abstract
The preparation of polystyrene/thermoplastic starch (PS/TPS) blends was divided into three stages. The first stage involved the preparation of TPS from sago starch. Then, for the second stage, PS was blended with TPS to produce a TPS/PS blend. The ratios of the TPS/PS blend were 20:80, 40:60, 60:40, and 80:20. The final stage was a modification of the composition of TPS/PS blends with succinic anhydride and ascorbic acid treatment. Both untreated and treated blends were characterized by their physical, thermal, and surface morphology properties. The obtained results indicate that modified blends have better tensile strength as the adhesion between TPS and PS was improved. This can be observed from SEM micrographs, as modified blends with succinic anhydride and ascorbic acid had smaller TPS dispersion in PS/TPS blends. The micrograph showed that there was no agglomeration and void formation in the TPS/PS blending process. Furthermore, modified blends show better thermal stability, as proved by thermogravimetric analysis. Water uptake into the TPS/PS blends also decreased after the modifications, and the structural analysis showed the formation of a new peak after the modification process.
Highlights
Over the years, there has been various research and developments in producing blends by incorporating natural polymers into synthetic polymers
thermoplastic starch (TPS) acts as an inert compound and increasing TPS in the blends leads to the reduction of tensile strength [25]
TPS compared was blended with polystyrene with different proportions
Summary
There has been various research and developments in producing blends by incorporating natural polymers into synthetic polymers. The major drawback of conventional plastics is low biodegradability when they were disposed of in typical solid waste landfills. They are called non-biodegradable polymers as they are not decomposed by microorganisms, and their carbon component cannot be broken down by the enzymes of microorganisms [4]. According to Santos et al, conventional plastic causes worse consequences for the environment due to common polyolefin, which has a very low degradation rate [5]. These facts were supported by Fischer et al, who stated that a higher cost is incurred for storing non-biodegradable plastic. Burning these plastics emits carbon dioxide (CO2 ), which contributes to green house effects resulting in global warming [6]
Sign-in/Register to view highlights & summary Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
