Abstract
Research background. About 30% of lumbar pain is caused by sacroiliac joint disfunction (Alayat et al., 2017). The problem often becomes chronic lower back pain of about 10–23% of people around the world (Diaz-Cerrillo et al., 2017). As a result, the lumbar function and muscle endurance decrease. Research aim was to investigate sacroiliac joint mobilization effect of lumbar pain and function on patients with chronic non-specifc lumbar pain. Methods. Twenty people who felt chronic non-specifc lumbar pain and had sacroiliac joint disfunction were investigated in this research. Research methods were VAS pain scale, Measurement of lumbar range of motion and Lumbar muscle stamina tests. Results. The results of the study showed that pain decreased in the study group from score 3.31 ± 0.56 to 1.38 ± 0.39 (p < 0.05). The torso muscle dynamics and isometric endurance and torso amplitude improved (p < 0.05), comparing values before and after treatment. In the control group, the pain after treatment decreased from score 3.02 ± 0.23 to 1.27 ± 0.36 (p < 0.05). The torso muscle dynamics and isometric endurance and torso amplitude improved (p < 0.05), comparing values before and after treatment. Conclusion. The spinal stabilization exercises together with sacroiliac joint mobilization are a more effective treatment than spinal stabilization exercises alone. In addition to this, average pain level decreased, function of lumbar part of spine as well as lumbar muscle stamina increased.Keywords: sacroiliac joint mobilization, chronic non-specifc lumbar pain, functional lumbar indicators.
Highlights
Pastaba. * – p < 0,05, statistiškai reikšmingas vidurkių skirtumas grupėse prieš gydymą ir po jo
Juosmens judesių amplitudžių vidurkiai prieš gydymą ir po jo Judesio amplitudė Lenkimas
ConclusionThe spinal stabilization exercises together with sacroiliac joint mobilization are a more effective treatment than spinal stabilization exercises alone
Summary
Tiriamosios grupės (stuburo stabilizavimo pratimų ir kryžmeninio klubo sąnario mobilizacijos) skausmo skalės vidurkis prieš gydymą buvo 3,31 ± 0,56 balo, po gydymo – 1,38 ± 0,39 balo. Kontrolinės grupės (stuburo stabilizavimo pratimų) skausmo skalės vidurkis prieš gydymą buvo 3,02 ± 0,23 balo, po gydymo – 1,27 ± 0,36 balo. Iš viso skausmo skalės vidurkis sumažėjo 1,75 ± 0,38 balo (p < 0,05). Palyginus abiejų grupių skausmo intensyvumą po gydymo, statistiškai reikšmingas skirtumas tarp grupių nenustatytas (p > 0,05) Palyginus abiejų grupių skausmo intensyvumą po gydymo, statistiškai reikšmingas skirtumas tarp grupių nenustatytas (p > 0,05) (žr. pav.)
Sign-in/Register to view highlights & summary Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callMore From: Reabilitacijos mokslai: slauga, kineziterapija, ergoterapija
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
