Abstract

Perioperative chemotherapy is a potential treatment for locally advanced gastric cancer. However, the optimal chemotherapy regimen remains unknown. To investigate the safety and efficacy of S-1 plus oxaliplatin (SOX) vs fluorouracil, leucovorin, and oxaliplatin (FOLFOX) as a perioperative chemotherapy regimen for patients with locally advanced gastric cancer. In this phase 3, open-label, multicenter, randomized clinical trial, patients from 12 Chinese hospitals were enrolled between June 2011 and August 2016, with a last follow-up date of September 2019. The primary tumor was evaluated as either invading the serosa or the adjacent structures with or without metastatic lymph nodes, and with no evidence of distant metastases. Data were analyzed from December 2019 to June 2020. Patients were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive either 6 perioperative (2-4 preoperative and 2-4 postoperative) 3-week cycles of 130 mg/m2 oxaliplatin on day 1 and 80 to 120 mg/d S-1 orally daily for 2 weeks (SOX) or 130 mg/m2 oxaliplatin, 400 mg/m2 fluorouracil, 400 mg/m2 leucovorin, and 2400 mg/m2 fluorouracil as 46-hour infusion on day 1 (FOLFOX). The primary end point was 3-year overall survival (OS). An absolute noninferiority margin of -8% was chosen. A total of 583 patients were enrolled; 293 were randomized to the SOX group and 290 were randomized to the FOLFOX group. Twelve patients (2.1%) refused preoperative chemotherapy (5 patients in the SOX group and 7 patients in the FOLFOX group), leaving a total of 288 patients in the SOX group (median [range] age, 61 [24 to 78] years; 197 men [68.4%]) and 283 patients in the FOLFOX group (median [range] age, 62 [24 to 80] years; 209 men [73.9%]) who received preoperative chemotherapy. The 3-year OS rate was 75.2% (95% CI, 70.3% to 80.5%) in the SOX group and 67.8% (95% CI, 62.5% to 73.5%) in the FOLFOX group. The absolute difference of 3-year OS rate between the 2 groups was 7.4% (95% CI, -0.1% to 14.9%), which was greater than the prespecified noninferiority margin (-8%) and showed the noninferiority of perioperative chemotherapy with SOX compared with FOLFOX. In this randomized clinical trial, SOX was noninferior to FOLFOX as perioperative chemotherapy for patients with locally advanced gastric cancer and could be recommended as an alternative treatment for these patients in Asia. ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01364376.

Highlights

  • Gastric cancer is the fifth most common malignant neoplasm and the third leading cause of cancerrelated death worldwide.[1]

  • The 3-year overall survival (OS) rate was 75.2% in the S-1 plus oxaliplatin (SOX) group and 67.8% in the FOLFOX group

  • The absolute difference of 3-year OS rate between the 2 groups was 7.4%, which was greater than the prespecified noninferiority margin (–8%) and showed the noninferiority of perioperative chemotherapy with SOX compared with FOLFOX

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Gastric cancer is the fifth most common malignant neoplasm and the third leading cause of cancerrelated death worldwide.[1]. The prognosis remains poor for patients with advanced gastric cancer, especially when the primary tumor penetrates the serosa or invades the surrounding structures, and the 5-year survival rate for these patients is approximately 25%.2,3. Multimodal treatment is necessary to improve the prognosis of patients with advanced gastric cancer. Perioperative chemotherapy has been shown to improve the overall survival (OS) of patients with resectable gastric cancer compared with surgery alone in 2 phase 3 randomized clinical trials (RCTs).[4,5]. The other study showed a significant increase of 5-year OS in patients who received perioperative chemotherapy with fluorouracil and cisplatin.[5]. In spite of these advances, the prognosis of patients with locally advanced, resectable gastric cancer remains unsatisfactory

Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call