Abstract
Abstract. This paper shows that differences between the predictions of an international real business cycle model with complete markets and the predictions of a model where agents can trade only risk‐free bonds depend heavily on three parameters: discount factor, and degrees of persistence and spillovers in productivity shocks. This sensitivity explains apparently paradoxical results previously obtained in the literature. Also, since empirical work finds that two of those parameters are not estimated precisely, the outcomes of quantitative studies comparing complete‐markets and bond economies using only the point estimates of those parameters inherit the substantial uncertainty in the parameter estimates.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
