Effect of rehabilitation by using the shortened dental arch concept on the thickness of the masseter muscle and occlusal force: A pilot study

Abstract

Statement of problemKnowledge of the effect of a shortened dental arch on masseter muscle thickness and occlusal force is sparse but could help clinicians understand how a shortened dental arch might affect the stomatognathic system. PurposeThe purpose of this pilot clinical study was to evaluate and compare the masseter muscle thickness and occlusal force of participants rehabilitated by using a shortened dental arch with matched completely dentate individuals. Material and methodsTwelve partially edentulous participants with a minimum of 1 posterior occluding pair on each side of the arch were enrolled in the study. The mandibular arch of these participants was rehabilitated by using a single posterior mandibular implant crown (group S). The maxillary arch of all participants in group S was intact. Masseter muscle thickness (cm) and occlusal force (N) were recorded before (T1) and 6 months after implant rehabilitation (T2) for each participant. Twelve participants were selected as controls (group C). They were matched for age, sex, height, and weight with group S and evaluated for masseter muscle thickness and occlusal force. Masseter muscle thickness was evaluated by using ultrasonography during the rest position and maximum volumetric clenching. Occlusal force was measured with an occlusal force measuring appliance. All recordings were done for the left and right sides of the arch. Descriptive analysis was followed by comparison between groups and within group S by using the paired t test (α=.05). ResultsHigher masseter muscle thickness and higher occlusal force were observed in group C than in group S before and after rehabilitation. An increase in masseter muscle thickness in the rest position and in maximum volumetric clenching was observed within group S after rehabilitation. Before rehabilitation, a difference in the masseter muscle thickness between group S and group C was statistically significant for the left side at the rest position (P=.017) and during maximum volumetric clenching (P=.016). After rehabilitation, the difference between group S and group C was not statistically significant for masseter muscle thickness at the rest position (P=.890 for right side and P=.555 for left side) and during maximum volumetric clenching (P=.109 for right side and P=.755 for left side). The difference in occlusal force between group S and group C was statistically significant for the right side and left side (P<.001) before rehabilitation and statistically not significant after rehabilitation (P=.161 for the right side and P=.134 for the left side). ConclusionsRehabilitation following the concept of a shortened dental arch increased masseter muscle thickness and occlusal force in partially edentulous individuals, making the masseter muscle thickness and occlusal force comparable with those of a completely dentate arch.