Abstract

Previous studies have revealed that interruption induces disruptive influences on the performance of cognitive tasks. While much research has focused on the use of multimodal channels to reduce the cost of interruption, few studies have utilized haptic information as more than an associative cue. In the present study, we utilized a multimodal task interruption scenario involving the simultaneous presentation of visual information and haptic stimuli in order to investigate how the combined stimuli affect performance on the primary task (cost of interruption). Participants were asked to perform a two-back visuo-tactile task, in which visual and haptic stimuli were presented simultaneously, which was interrupted by a secondary task that also utilized visual and haptic stimuli. Four experimental conditions were evaluated: (1) paired information (visual stimulus + paired haptic stimulus) with interruption; (2) paired information without interruption; (3) non-paired information (visual stimulus + non-paired haptic stimulus) with interruption; and (4) non-paired information without interruption. Our findings indicate that, within a visuo-tactile task environment, redundant haptic information may not only increase accuracy on the primary task but also reduce the cost of interruption in terms of accuracy. These results suggest a new way of understanding the task recovery process within a multimodal environment.

Highlights

  • In daily life, people face various cognitive tasks, such as sending an e-mail or entering data into a computer in their workspace or home

  • Multiple sensory channels have been studied to understand the cognitive processes involved in multimodal task interruption and recovery

  • Previous studies have focused on visual and auditory modalities in particular, while studies involving haptic stimuli have been limited to an investigation of their role as associative cues in enhancing performance during the primary task

Read more

Summary

Introduction

People face various cognitive tasks, such as sending an e-mail or entering data into a computer in their workspace or home. These tasks are quite simple and completed with no errors. Interruptions between multiple cognitive tasks occur frequently, and researchers have investigated these shifts in attention in workspaces via observational studies (Chisholm et al, 2000; Czerwinski et al, 2004; González and Mark, 2004). Numerous studies have attempted to identify how interruptions affect tasks and how people resume their original tasks after interruptions within a typical workspace (Czerwinski et al, 2004; Mark et al, 2005; Iqbal and Horvitz, 2007).

Objectives
Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call