Abstract

Early social experiences can affect the development and expression of individual social behaviour throughout life. In particular, early‐life social deprivations, notably of parental care, can later have deleterious consequences. We can, therefore, expect rearing procedures such as hand‐raising—widely used in ethology and socio‐cognitive science—to alter the development of individual social behaviour. We investigated how the rearing style later affected (a) variation in relationship strength among peers and (b) individuals’ patterns of social interactions, in three captive groups of juvenile non‐breeders consisting of either parent‐raised or hand‐raised birds, or a mix of both rearing styles. In the three groups, irrespectively of rearing style: strongest relationships (i.e., higher rates of association and affiliations) primarily emerged among siblings and familiar partners (i.e., non‐relatives encountered in early life), and mixed‐sex and male–male partners established relationships of similar strength, indicating that the rearing style does not severely affect the quality and structure of relationships in young ravens. However, compared to parent‐raised ravens, hand‐raised ravens showed higher connectedness, i.e., number of partners with whom they mainly associated and affiliated, but formed on average relationships of lower strength, indicating that social experience in early life is not without consequences on the development of ravens’ patterns of social interaction. The deprivation of parental care associated with the presence of same‐age peers during hand‐raising seemed to maximize ravens’ propensity to interact with others, indicating that besides parents, interactions with same‐age peers matter. Opportunities to interact with, and socially learn from peers, might thus be the key to the acquisition of early social competences in ravens.

Highlights

  • The way individuals integrate into their social environment can have major implications for their health, survival and reproductive success (Cameron, Setsaas, & Linklater, 2009; Schülke, Bhagavatula, Vigilant, & Ostner, 2010; Silk, 2007; Stanton & Mann, 2012)

  • We investigated how the absence of parental care could be compensated by the presence of sameage non-related peers, comparing individuals raised in a family unit by their parents, to individuals collectively hand-raised by humans, with other peers

  • Despite differences in group composition, and in particular group members rearing background, we found similar patterns of relationship strength variation according to partners identity and sex in the three groups

Read more

Summary

| INTRODUCTION

The way individuals integrate into their social environment can have major implications for their health, survival and reproductive success (Cameron, Setsaas, & Linklater, 2009; Schülke, Bhagavatula, Vigilant, & Ostner, 2010; Silk, 2007; Stanton & Mann, 2012). We can expect specific rearing treatment, such as hand-raising, to affect the development of individual's social behaviour and competences. Hand-raising is used for a variety of purposes, from animal husbandry in agriculture, production of pets, to the conservation of endangered populations It is used in academical research, in particular in ethology and cognitive science as it produces tamed individuals, showing reduced neophobia and fear towards humans (Adams, Cockrem, Taylor, Candy, & Bridges, 2005; Jones & Waddington, 1992). In case parental care would be most critical for the development of ravens’ social behaviour, we would expect to find substantial differences between groups and between parent- and hand-raised individuals. If the presence of other peers compensates for the absence of parental care, we would expect: (a) similar patterns of variations in the three groups; and (b) similar individuals’ patterns irrespective of rearing style

| METHODS
Findings
| DISCUSSION
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call