Abstract
The proliferation of applications for near infrared (NIR) spectroscopy has been fostered by advances in instrumentation and statistics. NIR analytical instrumentation is becoming more stable and reliable. Chemometrics is playing an important role in qualitative and quantitative NIR spectra analysis. The objective of this study was to evaluate the performances of four commonly used calibration models: (1) stepwise multiple linear regression (SMLR); (2) classical least-squares (CLS); (3) principal component regression (PCR); and (4) partial least-squares (PLS) in NIR spectroscopy analysis when random noise is present in the optical data. A conceptually simple procedure for comparing the performance of the four calibration methods in the presence of different levels of random noise in spectra data has been introduced here. This procedure, using the computer simulation data and real spectra of tobacco, has provided useful information for understanding the effects of random noise on the performance of multivariate calibration methods. Both numerical and graphical results will be shown.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
