Abstract

The widely used microbial source tracking (MST) technique, quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR), quantifies host-specific gene abundance in polluted water to identify and prioritize contamination sources. This study characterized the effects of a qPCR data analysis using the sample PCR efficiencies (the LinRegPCR model) on gene abundance and compared them with the standard curve-based method (the mixed model). Five qPCR assays were evaluated: the universal GenBac3, human-specific HF183/BFDrev and CPQ_056, swine-specific Pig-2-Bac, and cattle-specific Bac3qPCR assays. The LinRegPCR model increased the low-copy amplification, especially in the HF183/BFDrev assay, thus lowering the specificity to 0.34. Up to 1.41 log10 copies/g and 0.41 log10 copies/100 mL differences were observed for composite fecal and sewage samples (n = 147) by the LinRegPCR approach, corresponding to an 18.2% increase and 6.4% decrease, respectively. Freshwater samples (n = 48) demonstrated a maximum of 1.95 log10 copies/100 mL difference between the two models. Identical attributing sources by both models were shown in 54.55% of environmental samples; meanwhile, the LinRegPCR approach improved the inability to identify sources by the mixed model in 29.55% of the samples. This study emphasizes the need for a standardized data analysis protocol for qPCR MST assays for interlaboratory consistency and comparability.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call