Effect of projective aspects variations on estimates of changes in bone mass using digital subtraction radiography.

Abstract

This study tests the hypothesis that estimates of changes in bone mass derived from subtraction data obtained in accord with published methods are independent of the spatial aspect of the lesion being evaluated when calibrations are performed independently. Nineteen sliver-shaped bone chips ranging in mass from approximately 1 to 35 mg were orientated with broad side parallel to the facial surface of a hemisectioned dry human mandible and radiographed using conventional exposure parameters on conventional E-speed dental X-ray film. Also attached to the film was a standardized aluminium calibration wedge that facilitated quantitative analysis of resulting subtraction data using established methodology. The effects of scatter were simulated by the addition of a 1-cm-thick slab of tissue-equivalent plastic. A second series of exposures then was produced using the same respective spatial chip locations and projection geometries but each chip was reorientated such that its broad side was now positioned perpendicular to the mandibular facial surface. Finally, a comparable series of control exposures was produced without any chips or calibration wedge to facilitate subtraction. When paired bone estimates derived from the two chip orientations were compared (paired comparisons) using Student's t-test, a statistically significant difference (p < 0.05) was observed. These results also were tested for statistical significance using the non-parametric Wilcoxon test. As with the parametric analysis, the discrepancy between the parallel and perpendicular mass estimates was found to statistically significant (p < 0.05). The methods employed in this investigation thus resulted in bone mass estimates that varied significantly depending upon lesion orientation.