Abstract

The study aimed to (1) compare the accuracy and precision of 3-dimensional (3D) printed retainers at various angulations and (2) evaluate the effect of angulation on printing time and the amount of resin consumed. Using a stereolithography 3D printer, 60 clear retainers were printed at 5 angulations (n=12, each): 15°, 30°, 45°, 60°, and 90°. Samples for each group were randomly printed in a batch of 6 retainers at all print angulations as print 1 and print 2 cycles. Digital images of the original and printed samples were superimposed. Discrepancies on 8 landmarks were measured by 2 independent examiners, and 0.25mm was set as the clinically acceptable threshold to determine the accuracy of the retainers. Deviations ranged from 0.074mm to 0.225mm from the reference retainer at the cusp tips and incisal edges at all angulations, falling within the threshold of clinical acceptance. However, smooth surface measurements with deviations up to 0.480mm were deemed clinically not acceptable. Three-dimensional printing at 15° was estimated to be the most time-efficient, whereas 3D printing at 45° was shown to be the most cost-effective setting. Three-dimensional printed retainers, using a stereolithography printer, were found to be accurate within 0.25mm at all print angulations at the cusp tips and incisal edges compared with the digital reference file. Smooth facial surfaces did not meet clinical acceptability. Print angulations were shown to affect the cost and amount of resin used.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.