Abstract

Previous works demonstrated that the Fe-Ag/Al2O3 catalyst could efficiently reduce NO into N2 by propene with a good resistance towards H2O and SO2. In this work, the effect of preparation method on the performance of Fe-Ag/Al2O3 catalyst in the selective catalytic reduction (SCR) of NO with propene was investigated. Three typical methods, viz., physical grinding (PG), direct impregnation (DI) and sol-gel-impregnation (SGI), were comparatively used to load the active components onto the supports. The results indicate that all the catalysts prepared by these three methods display good tolerance towards water vapor and SO2. However, they are rather different in the denitration efficiency; the maximum NO removal efficiency of the catalysts prepared by three methods follows the order of SGI (100%) > PG (62%) > DI (58%). Various characterization results reveal that the catalytic performance of Fe-Ag/Al2O3/CM was mainly related to the porous surface and Fe-Ag interaction. By using the SGI approach, the primary support of cordierite and the secondary support of Al2O3 work together to achieve a large surface area and an intense interaction between Fe and Ag on the resultant DP-Fe/Ag/Al2O3/CM catalyst, forming the bimetal AgFeO2 oxide and displaying the best reducibility. In terms of the PG method, the prepared GR-Fe/Ag/Al2O3 catalyst is powdery and shows the largest surface area; however, without cordierite serving as the monolithic support, Ag2O and Fe3O4 exist as separate oxides together with a hint of elemental Ag. As a result, the GR-Fe/Ag/Al2O3 catalyst shows poor reducibility due to the lack of porous surface to facilitate the Fe-Ag interaction. In contrast, the DP-Fe/Ag/CM catalyst prepared using the DI method shows rather poor dispersion of Fe and Ag due to the absence of the secondary support of Al2O3; in fact, individual Ag2O and Fe3O4 agglomerate on the catalyst surface and no AgFeO2 species is detected. Therefore, the DP-Fe/Ag/CM catalyst, with the surface area of only 1/4 of that for Fe-Ag/Al2O3/CM-SGI, exhibits the poorest activity in the SCR of NO by propene.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.