Abstract

To assess the effect of pooling fecal samples on the sensitivity of detection of E. coli O157:H7, 12 calves, inoculated orally with 10(8)cfu per calf of nalidixic acid resistant E. coli O157:H7, were used to provide positive fecal samples. After inoculation, calves were sampled twice weekly. Negative fecal samples were from calves at a local dairy. Samples from inoculated calves were incubated without pooling or were mixed with known negative fecal samples in a 1:4 ratio or a 2:3 ratio (positive:negative) for detection of E. coli O157:H7. Samples were enriched 6h in Gram negative broth with vancomycin, cefixime, and cefsoludin, underwent immunomagnetic separation with Dynabeads, and were plated onto sorbitol MacConkey agar with cefixime, and tellurite (SMACct). Morphologically typical colonies were plated onto blood agar, incubated overnight at 37 degrees C and an indole test was performed on each colony. Indole positives colonies were plated on SMAC agar with 20 microg/ml nalidixic acid (SMACnal). Colonies that grew on SMACnal were confirmed by O157 agglutination. Sensitivity of detection in non-pooled samples was 77%. Samples pooled 1:4 and 2:3 with negative samples were 55 and 52% sensitive, respectively. Pooling decreased sensitivity of detection for E. coli O157:H7 in bovine fecal samples (P<0.01). A deterministic binomial probability model was developed to assess the probability of detecting pens of cattle shedding E. coli O157 using a pooling protocol or individual samples. Pooling decreased sensitivity of detection at low pen prevalence compared to individual samples but was similar at high prevalence.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call