Abstract

Staphylococcus aureus is a Gram-positive bacterium that is present in the human microbiota. Nevertheless, these bacteria can be pathogenic to the humans. Due to the increasing occurrence of antibiotic-resistant S. aureus strains, new approaches to control this pathogen are necessary. The antimicrobial photodynamic inactivation (PDI) process is based in the combined use of light, oxygen, and an intermediary agent (a photosensitizer). These three components interact to generate cytotoxic reactive oxygen species that irreversibly damage vital constituents of the microbial cells and ultimately lead to cell death. Although PDI is being shown to be a promising alternative to the antibiotic approach for the inactivation of pathogenic microorganisms, information on effects of photosensitization on particular virulence factors is strikingly scarce. The objective of this work was to evaluate the effect of PDI on virulence factors of S. aureus and to assess the potential development of resistance of this bacterium as well as the recovery of the expression of the virulence factors after successive PDI cycles. For this, the photosensitizer 5,10,15,20-tetrakis(1-methylpyridinium-4-yl)porphyrin tetra-iodide (Tetra-Py+-Me) and six strains of S. aureus [one reference strain, one strain with one enterotoxin, two strains with three enterotoxins and two methicillin resistant strains (MRSA) – one with five enterotoxins and the other without enterotoxins] were used. The effect of photosensitization on catalase activity, beta hemolysis, lipases, thermonuclease, enterotoxins, coagulase production, and resistance/susceptibility to methicillin was tested. To assess the development of resistance after successive cycles of treatment, three strains of S. aureus (ATCC 6538, 2065 MA, and SA 3 MRSA) were used. The surviving colonies of a first cycle of PDI were collected from the solid medium and subjected to further nine consecutive cycles of PDI. The results indicate that the expression of some external virulence factors is affected by PDI and enterotoxin producing strains were more susceptible to PDI than non-toxigenic strains. The surviving bacteria did not develop resistance. PDI, contrarily to traditional antibiotics, inhibited the expression of virulence factors, efficiently inactivating either highly virulent strains and low virulent S. aureus strains, inactivating also antibiotic susceptible and resistant strains, without development of photoresistance after at least 10 consecutive cycles of treatment, and so this therapy may become a strong promising alternative to antibiotics to control pathogenic microorganisms.

Highlights

  • IntroductionStaphylococcus aureus is a Gram-positive bacterium that resides on the surface of the skin and on mucous membranes of warmblooded animals (Morikawa et al, 2001; Costa A.R. et al, 2013) as a commensal microorganism, asymptomatically colonizing the host (Bronner et al, 2004)

  • The objectives of this work were the evaluation of the effect of photodynamic inactivation (PDI) on some virulence factors of S. aureus – catalase activity, beta hemolysis, lipases, thermonuclease, enterotoxins, coagulase – and the assessment of development of resistance to PDI treatment

  • An experimental procedure was established in order to study the effects of PDI on some virulence factors expression/activity of S. aureus strains and to test the potential development of resistance to PDI by S. aureus strains after successive photodynamic cycles of treatment, testing the recovery of the expression/activity of the virulence factors after the successive photodynamic cycles of treatment

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Staphylococcus aureus is a Gram-positive bacterium that resides on the surface of the skin and on mucous membranes of warmblooded animals (Morikawa et al, 2001; Costa A.R. et al, 2013) as a commensal microorganism, asymptomatically colonizing the host (Bronner et al, 2004). Its ability to survive under stressful conditions, such as those imposed by host immune system, is due to the activation of stress response mechanisms (Morikawa et al, 2001; Bronner et al, 2004; Cheung et al, 2004) These mechanisms involve the action of an interactive regulatory network that includes the accessory gene regulator (agr) and staphylococcal accessory element (sae) (Bronner et al, 2004; Novick and Geisinger, 2008; Costa A.R. et al, 2013). The regulatory network includes the staphylococcal accessory regulator A (sarA) and its homologs that regulate the expression of some virulence factors; the sigma factors (σ), as the primary sigma factor, σA, that may function in living process through the housekeeping genes expression and the alternative sigma factor σB, which may participate on the bacterial response to stress conditions by regulating the expression of several genes involved on stress response (Morikawa et al, 2001; Cheung et al, 2004; Costa A.R. et al, 2013)

Objectives
Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call