Abstract

The data of 429 patients with all from January 2012 to December 2020 were retrospectively analyzed. According to the results of cytogenetic karyotype analysis, they were divided into Ph+ group (n=64), Ph- monomeric karyotype (MK) group (n=53) and Ph- NMK group (n=312). According to the treatment plan, they were divided into allo-HSCT group (n=236) and non-allo-HSCT group (n=193). The effects of karyotype and allo-HSCT on the short-term and long-term outcomes of all patients were analyzed. Among the 429 patients, 6 (1.40%) died during induction therapy, 60 (13.99%) had no response, 363 (84.62%) achieved complete remission (CR) and 287 (66.90%) achieved minimal residual disease negative (MRD-). There was no significant difference in short-term efficacy (CR%, CR1%, MRD-%) among Ph+ group, Ph- MK group and Ph- non-MK group (P>0.05). The median OS was 6.9 months (95% CI: 4.6-8.2 months) for 60 unresponsive patients and 39.8 months (95% CI: 28.6-45.9 months) for 363 CR patients. There was no significant difference in the long-term efficacy [5-year cumulative recurrence rate (CIR%), disease-free survival rate (DFS%) and overall survival rate (OS%) among Ph- group, Ph- MK group and Ph- non-MK group (P>0.05). Among 429 patients, 55.01% (236/429) underwent allo-HSCT. The short-term efficacy (CR%, MRD-%) and long-term efficacy (CIR%, DFS%, OS%)] of patients with allo-HSCT after more than 2 consolidation cycles were better than those of patients with non-allo-HSCT (P<0.05). For the three subgroups of Ph+ group, Ph- MK group and Ph- non-MK group, the short-term and long-term efficacy of allo-HSCT patients was better than that of non-allo-HSCT patients. Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that liver/spleen/lymph node enlargement was a risk factor for CIR, DFS and OS, with adjusted or of 1.23 (95% CI: 1.08-2.78, P=0.032), 1.21 (95% CI: 1.03-2.34, P=0.038) and 1.25 (95% CI: 1.08-2.97, P=0.028), respectively. No transplantation was a risk fator for CIR, DFS, OS. The adjusted or were 2.34 (95% CI: 1.18-5.39, P<0.001), 2.15 (95% CI: 1.10-4.34, P<0.001) and 2.28 (95% CI: 1.09-4.11, P<0.001), respectively. Karyotype (Ph+/- and MK/non-MK) seems to have no effect on the short-term and long-term efficacy of all patients; allo-HSCT can affect the short-term and long-term efficacy of all patients and improve their prognosis; liver/spleen/lymph node enlargement and non-implementation of allo-HSCT treatment strategy are the risk factors for poor prognosis of all patients.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call