Effect of Peptide Sequence on the LCST-Like Transition of Elastin-Like Peptides and Elastin-Like Peptide-Collagen-Like Peptide Conjugates: Simulations and Experiments.

Abstract

Elastin-like polypeptides (ELPs) are thermoresponsive biopolymers that undergo an LCST-like phase transition in aqueous solutions. The temperature of this LCST-like transition, Tt , can be tuned by varying the number of repeat units in the ELP, sequence and composition of the repeat units, the solution conditions, and via conjugation to other biomacromolecules. In this study, we show how and why the choice of guest (X) residue in the VPGXG pentad repeat tunes the Tt of short ELPs, (VPGXG)4, in the free state and when conjugated to collagen-like peptides (CLPs). In experiments, the (VPGWG)4 chain (in short, WWWW) has a Tt < 278 K, while (VPGFG)4 or FFFF has a Tt > 353 K in both free ELP and ELP-CLP systems. The Tt for the FWWF ELP sequence decreases from being >353 K for free ELP to <278 K for the corresponding ELP-CLP system. The decrease in Tt upon conjugation to CLP has been shown to be due to the crowding of ELP chains that decreases the entropic loss upon ELP aggregation. Even though the net hydrophobicity of ELP has been reasoned to drive the Tt , the origins of lower Tt of WWWW compared to FFFF are unclear, as there is disagreement in hydrophobicity scales in how phenylalanine (F) compares to tryptophan (W). Motivated by these experimental observations, we use a combination of atomistic and coarse-grained (CG) molecular dynamics simulations. Atomistic simulations of free and tethered ELPs show that WWWW are more prone to acquire β-turn structures than FFFF at lower temperatures. Also, the atomistically informed CG simulations show that the increased local stiffness in W than F due to the bulkier side chain in W compared to F, alone does not cause the shift in the transition of WWWW versus FFFF. The experimentally observed lower Tt of WWWW than FFFF is achieved in CG simulations only when the CG model incorporates both the atomistically informed local stiffness and stronger effective attractions localized at the W position versus the F position. The effective interactions localized at the guest residue in the CG model is guided by our atomistically observed increased propensity for β-turn structure in WWWW versus FFFF and by past experimental work of Urry et al. quantifying hydrophobic differences through enthalpy of association for W versus F.