Abstract
Theoretical explanations of the foot-in-the door effect lead to the prediction that persons offered a monetary payment for their compliance to an initial, small request would not be more likely to comply with a subsequent demand. For their participation in a telephone survey, some subjects were promised $2 (Payment condi tion), while others were not (No Payment). (1) The rate of compliance to a subsequent request for the No Payment condition (45.8%) was not higher than that for a no-initial-contract control group (55.6%). (2) Payment condition subjects (78.3%) were more compliant with the second request. A follow-up study suggested that subjects' expec tation of reward did not mediate the higher rate of compliance in the Payment condition. Other possible explanations for that finding are considered.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.