Abstract
Effect of para‐substituents in the ethylene (E) copolymerization with 1‐decene (DC), 1‐dodecene (DD), and with 2‐methyl‐1‐pentene (2M1P) using a series of Cp*TiCl2(O‐2,6‐iPr2‐4‐R‐C6H2) [R=H (1), tBu (2), Ph (3), CHPh2 (4), CPh3 (5), SiMe3 (6), SiEt3 (7), and newly prepared 4‐tBuC6H4 (8) and 3,5‐Me2C6H3 (9)]‐MAO catalyst systems has been studied. The activities in these copolymerization reactions were affected by the para‐substituent, and the SiMe3 (6), SiEt3 (7) and 3,5‐Me2C6H3 (9) analogues showed the higher activities at 50 °C in the E copolymerization reactions with DC (1.06–1.44×106 kg‐polymer/mol‐Ti⋅h), DD (1.04–1.88×106 kg‐polymer/mol‐Ti⋅h) than the others, whereas no significant differences were observed in the comonomer incorporations. Complexes 6 and 7 also showed the higher activities at 50 °C in the E/2M1P copolymerization, and the 2M1P incorporation was affected by the para‐substituent and the polymerization temperature; complex 9 showed better 2M1P incorporation at 25 °C.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
