Abstract

Effects of addition of P to Co–W coatings from gluconate bath using direct current (DC) and pulse current (PC) methods have been investigated in this study. Co–W–P coatings with different P concentrations are prepared by varying hypophosphite concentration in the bath. Current efficiency of the Co–W–P electrodeposition is lower than that for Co–W coatings. Increase in NaH2PO2 concentration increases the cobalt content significantly and decreases the tungsten content drastically. Co–W–P coatings display ‘cauliflower‐like’ morphology and roughness of the coatings increases with increasing P content. As‐deposited Co–W–P deposits are amorphous while heat treatment at different temperatures has rendered them crystalline with the precipitation of stable species like, Co3W, Co2P, etc. Unlike Co–W coatings, Co–W–P shows two‐step crystallization in differential scanning calorimetry (DSC) and on heat treatment, which is similar to the behavior of Co–P electrodeposited from gluconate baths. Moreover, inclusion of phosphorous and heat treatment have led to significant increase in microhardness of the Co–W–P coatings. X‐ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) studies provide a detailed insight into the nature of Co, W and P species in as‐deposited and sputtered coatings. Microhardness of the heat‐treated coatings is higher than the as‐deposited counterparts and is comparable with that of hard chromium. Copyright © 2016 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.