Abstract
Surgical repair of sagittal suture craniosynostosis is highly variable, and optimal timing/use of bone grafts remains a subset of parameters that continue to be studied. We sought to compare cephalometric outcomes of early surgical intervention without bone grafting compared to later intervention with bone grafting. Patients undergoing primary surgical repair of nonsyndromic sagittal suture craniosynostosis between 2015 and 2019 were followed with preoperative measurements of cephalic index along with postoperative measurements at 6 months to 1 year, respectively. Nineteen patients undergoing cranial vault reconstruction were studied in 2 groups, namely those younger than 6 months who did not have bone grafting performed during primary repair (31.6%) and patients 6 months and older who underwent cranial vault reconstruction with bone grafting during primary repair (68.4%). Mean 6-month to 1-year postoperative cranial index was significantly increased in both groups (P < 0.001). The average cephalic index change for both groups (younger than 6 months without bone grafting, CI value change 9; 6 months and older with bone grafting; CI value change 6) was not significantly different with regards to 95% confidence interval (P = 0.30). Patients older than 6 months of age undergoing cranial vault reconstruction with bone grafting have similar cephalometric outcomes as their younger counterparts undergoing cranial vault remodeling without bone grafting. Bone grafting in the appropriate cohort may improve functional and esthetic outcomes without compromising primary surgical goals of improving cranial vault cephalometric indices.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.