Effect of oocyte vitrification on embryo quality: time-lapse analysis and morphokinetic evaluation

Abstract

To analyze whether oocyte vitrification may affect subsequent embryo development from a morphokinetic standpoint by means of time-lapse imaging. Observational cohort study. University-affiliated private IVF center. Ovum donation cycles conducted with the use of vitrified (n = 631 cycles; n = 3,794 embryos) or fresh oocytes (n = 1,359 cycles; n = 9,935 embryos) over 2years. None. Embryo development was analyzed in a time-lapse imaging incubator. The studied variables included time to 2cells (t2), 3cells (t3), 4cells (t4), 5cells (t5), morula (tM), and cavitated, early, and hatching blastocyst (tB, tEB, tHB) as well as 2nd cell cycle duration (cc2 = t3 - t2). All of the embryos were classified according to the hierarchic tree model currently used for embryo selection. The analyzed variables were compared with the use of analysis of variance or chi-square and included 95% confidence intervals (CIs). The embryos that originated from vitrified oocytes showed a delay of ∼1hour from the first division to 2cells (t2) to the time of blastulation (tB). The embryos that originated from vitrified oocytes showed a delay of ∼1hour from the 1st division to 2cells (t2) to the time of blastulation (tB) (P<.05). The proportions of embryos allocated to categories A-E in the hierarchical tree were similar between groups. No differences in implantation rates between the fresh (51.3% [95% CI 47.1%-55.7%]) and vitrified (46.4% [95% CI 38.4%-54.4%]) groups were found. The embryo quality of vitrified oocytes was not impaired: cc2, quality according to our hierarchic morphokinetic model, and implantation rates were similar between fresh and vitrified oocytes. However, morphokinetic differences were observed from t2 to tB. Our main study limitation was the retrospective nature of the analysis, although a large database was studied.