Abstract

BackgroundThe impact of web-based formative assessment practices on performance of undergraduate medical students in summative assessments is not widely studied. This study was conducted among third-year undergraduate medical students of a designated university in Malaysia to compare the effect, on performance in summative assessment, of repeated computer-based formative assessment with automated feedback with that of single paper-based formative assessment with face-to face feedback.MethodsThis quasi-randomized trial was conducted among two groups of undergraduate medical students who were selected by stratified random technique from a cohort undertaking the Musculoskeletal module. The control group C (n = 102) was subjected to a paper-based formative MCQ test. The experimental group E (n = 65) was provided three online formative MCQ tests with automated feedback. The summative MCQ test scores for both these groups were collected after the completion of the module.ResultsIn this study, no significant difference was observed between the mean summative scores of the two groups. However, Band 1 students from group E with higher entry qualification showed higher mean score in the summative assessment. A trivial, but significant and positive correlation (r2 = +0.328) was observed between the online formative test scores and summative assessment scores of group E. The proportionate increase of performance in group E was found to be almost double than group C.ConclusionThe use of computer based formative test with automated feedback improved the performance of the students with better academic background in the summative assessment. Computer-based formative test can be explored as an optional addition to the curriculum of pre-clinical integrated medical program to improve the performance of the students with higher academic ability.

Highlights

  • The impact of web-based formative assessment practices on performance of undergraduate medical students in summative assessments is not widely studied

  • The overall mean score in the end-of-module summative assessment was almost similar in the student group exposed to the online computer based formative test and the student group exposed to the paper-based formative test (Table 2)

  • Band 1 students belonging to group E showed higher mean score in the summative assessment compared to similar band of students in group C

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The impact of web-based formative assessment practices on performance of undergraduate medical students in summative assessments is not widely studied. This study was conducted among third-year undergraduate medical students of a designated university in Malaysia to compare the effect, on performance in summative assessment, of repeated computer-based formative assessment with automated feedback with that of single paper-based formative assessment with face-to face feedback. Formative assessment consists of activities to determine the level of knowledge of students for the purpose of providing feedback and planning of future instruction [1]. A study conducted among 909 final-year students observed that the students receiving a remedial intervention after poor performance on a formative test were able to improve marks in the summative examination as compared to those who did not receive remediation [6].

Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call