Abstract

Three non-ionic adjuvants, Agral, Silwet, and Greemax, at three concentrations, were applied on apple leaves with the use of hollow cone nozzles (TR) and air-induction nozzles (ID) to verify the assumption that adjuvants may improve spray coverage obtained by coarse droplets, and thereby ensure both satisfactory application quality and an environmental advantage. Spray coverage and droplet density were measured on both sides of the leaves. The adjuvants enhanced the spray coverage when applied at a certain concentration level. In general, the adjuvant coverage produced by the ID nozzles equaled the pure water coverage produced by the TR nozzles, thereby showing the adjuvants’ potential to compensate for the lower spray coverage usually obtained by coarse spray. A higher spray coverage was obtained on the lower side of leaves, which is discussed in terms of leaf surface properties. In the experiment with the mixture of Silwet and the fungicide Delan (dithianon), the product interacted with the adjuvant, resulting in the reversed picture of spray coverage and droplet density on the upper and lower leaf sides compared to the results obtained for the adjuvant alone. The combination of coarse spray nozzles with adjuvants may reduce environmental pollution without compromising the quality of spray applications in fruit growing.

Highlights

  • Pesticides are still intensively used in agriculture to protect crops and ensure the quality of products

  • The spray distribution was determined by measuring spray coverage expressed as a percentage of the target area covered by spray liquid, and droplet density as a count of drop stains per unit area of the target

  • Droplet density on both leaf surfaces with all tested adjuvants was considerably higher for fine spray TR nozzles than coarse spray induction nozzles (ID) nozzles

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Pesticides are still intensively used in agriculture to protect crops and ensure the quality of products. Previous studies showed that fine droplets usually result in a higher spray coverage and a better biological efficacy of treatments in favorable weather conditions than those obtained by coarse droplets, which are less prone to drift but more likely to rebound from the leaf surface [3]. A lower biological effect of herbicides applied with coarse droplets, produced by air-inclusion nozzles, was observed in field crops [4,5]. Coarse droplets resulted in similar disease control in orchards to that of fine droplets, produced by conventional hollow cone nozzles [8,9,10,11,12,13]. The incidents of lower biological efficacy observed for air-inclusion nozzles than for conventional hollow-cone nozzles can be explained by the poorer spray coverage and lower spray droplet density.

Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call