Abstract

Little attention has been paid to the role of stacking fault energy (SFE) in the two-body abrasive wear of austenitic steels. Using a pin-abrasion test with 220 grit garnet paper as the counterbody, three austenitic steels of different SFEs were compared. The steels were: (i) FeMnAlC, (ii) Hadfield steel, and (iii) AISI 316L steel. Following a pre-conditioning procedure, the normal loads on the 3mm diameter test pins were 5N, 10N and 15N, and the sliding speed along a spiral track of total length 430m was 0.158m/s. Data showed that the FeMnAlC steel had a higher wear resistance than AISI 316L steel but lower wear resistance than the Hadfield steel. However, at the highest test load, all three steels had similar wear resistance. The steel with the lowest SFE had the highest abrasive wear resistance and the steel with the highest SFE had the lowest abrasive wear resistance. The main wear mechanisms were microcutting and microploughing. There was a transition from microploughing to microcutting as the normal load was increased.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call