Abstract

Recent researches suggest that functional diversity represents the response of communities to environmental alterations better than taxonomic diversity. However, there is scarce information about how the functional diversity of freshwater fishes is affected by habitat type and the dominance of non-native species. To address this question, we analysed a large database containing 15 morpho-functional traits of 61 fish species from the Pannon Biogeographic region (Hungary). Based on a fish faunistic list and relative abundance of taxa, we quantified the taxonomic and functional diversity of riverine communities for > 700 sites of six habitat types. We asked how non-native fishes affected the taxonomic and functional diversity in different river types and at the local scale (i.e. at the site level), and how the diversity measures of native fauna elements changes along the invasion gradient. Our results showed that both functional and taxonomic richness increases with habitat complexity, from small headwater streams to large rivers. Therefore taxonomic diversity served as a good proxy for functional diversity along the environmental gradient of river types. Non-natives showed considerable functional diversity relative to their species number in each habitat type. Diversity values of native fauna elements initially increased, and then showed a major decrease along the invasion gradient. River type-specific evaluations highlighted the importance of considering the proliferation of invasive species based on both taxonomic and functional diversity indices. We argue that type-specific action plans are needed in conservation management to preserve the taxonomic and functional diversity of native fishes in Hungary, but also elsewhere.

Highlights

  • Freshwaters are among the most endangered ecosystems on Earth (Carpenter et al 1992; Jenkins 2003; Dudgeon et al 2006)

  • 200,750 individuals classified into 61 fish species and hybrids were recorded (Fig. 1, Table 2)

  • The lowest number of non-native species was recorded in submontain streams (5 species), while the highest number of non-native species was found in lowland rivers (13 species)

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Freshwaters are among the most endangered ecosystems on Earth (Carpenter et al 1992; Jenkins 2003; Dudgeon et al 2006). Based on the results of former studies, we hypothesized that non-native fishes would increase both the taxonomic and functional diversity of riverine fish at the entire community level, and that their influence would depend on river type In this regard, we predicted the largest changes in diversity in lowland streams and rivers compared with other river types, since these habitats were found to contain the most nonnative fishes in the Pannon (Takács et al 2017) and other biogeographic regions (Stewart et al 2016; Milardi et al 2019). Non-native fishes can extirpate native ones in dynamically changing riverine habitats (Baltz and Moyle 1993; Kominoski et al 2018), but more frequently, influence their relative abundance relationships Their effects on the diversity of native fish communities is hard to predict for each river type, since this may largely depend on the degree of invasion and specific functional attributes of non-native fishes. This underlines the importance of understanding the influence of non-natives on native communities in a river type specific manner

Materials and methods
Results
Discussion
41 Phoxinus phoxinus
61 Zingel zingel
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call