Effect of non-recommended doses versus recommended doses of direct oral anticoagulants in atrial fibrillation patients: A meta-analysis.

Abstract

BackgroundSeveral observational studies have shown that the inappropriate dosing use of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) in atrial fibrillation (AF) that does not conform to recommendations is becoming a widespread phenomenon. Therefore, we performed a meta‐analysis and systematic review to assess the effect of non‐recommended doses versus recommended doses of DOACs on the effectiveness and safety outcomes among AF patients.MethodsThe PubMed and Ovid databases were systematically searched to identify the relevant studies until December 2020. The effect estimates were hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs), which were pooled using a fixed‐effects model (I2 ≤ 50%) or a random‐effects model (I2 > 50%).ResultsA total of 11 studies were included in this meta‐analysis. Compared with recommended dosing of DOACs, non‐recommended low dosing of DOACs was associated with increased risks of stroke or systemic embolism (SSE, HR = 1.29, 95% CI 1.12–1.49) and all‐cause death (HR = 1.37, 95% CI 1.15–1.62), but not the ischemic stroke, myocardial infarction, gastrointestinal bleeding, intracranial bleeding, and major bleeding. Compared with recommended dosing of DOACs, non‐recommended high dosing of DOACs was associated with increased risks of SSE (HR = 1.44, 95% CI 1.01–2.04), major bleeding (HR = 1.99, 95% CI 1.48–2.68), and all‐cause death(HR = 1.38, 95% CI 1.02–1.87).ConclusionCompared with recommended dosing of DOACs, non‐recommended low dosing of DOACs was associated with increased risks of SSE and all‐cause death. Further study should confirm the findings of non‐recommended high dosing versus recommended dosing of DOACs.