Effect of nitinol implant porosity on cranial bone ingrowth and apposition after 6 weeks

Abstract

The present study addresses two aspects of the use of nitinol in cranial bone defect repair. The first is to verify that there is substantial bone ingrowth into the implant after 6 weeks; the second is to determine the effect of pore size on the ability of bone to grow into the implant during the early (6-week) postoperative period. Porous equiatomic (equal atomic masses of titanium and nickel) nickel–titanium (nitinol) implants with three different morphologies (differing in pore size and percent porosity) were implanted for 6 weeks in the parietal bones of New Zealand White rabbits. Ingrowth of bone into the implants and apposition of bone along the exterior and interior implant surfaces were calculated. The mean pore size (MPS) of implant type #1 (353 ± 74 μm) differed considerably from implant types #2 (218 ± 28 μm) and #3 (178 ± 31 μm). There was no significant difference among implant types in the percentages of bone and void/soft tissue composition of the aggregate implants. The amount of bone ingrowth also was not significantly different among the implant types. Implant #1 was significantly higher in pore volume and thus had a significantly higher volume of ingrown bone (2.59 ± 0.60 mm3) than implant #3 (1.52 ± 0.66 mm3) and a greater amount, but not significantly greater, than implant #2 (1.76 ± 0.47 mm3). Pore size does not appear to affect bone ingrowth during the cartilaginous period of bone growth in the implant. This implies that within the commonly accepted range of implant porosities (150–400 μm), at 6 weeks bone ingrowth near the interface of nitinol implants is similar. © 1999 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. J Biomed Mater Res, 45, 42–47, 1999.