Abstract

AbstractColored neckbands are known to reduce survival rates of geese, but the underlying cause for lower survival is unknown. We tested the hypothesis that hunters cause this lower survival rate by actively targeting neckbanded geese. We evaluated this hypothesis by estimating recovery and survival rates of adult Ross's geese (Chen rossii) at both Queen Maud Gulf (QMG) and McConnell River (MCR) Migratory Bird Sanctuaries carrying each of 3 marker combinations: 1) standard legbands (n = 11,321) for basic estimates of recovery and survival rates; 2) standard legbands and colored neckbands (n = 8,587) as the marked sample most detectable and thus most vulnerable to targeting by hunters; and 3) standard legbands and white neckbands (n = 6,501) as the sample exposed to the general risks of carrying neckbands but only minimally detectable by hunters, if at all. Recovery rates (±95% CL) of Ross's geese were lowest for those marked with legbands (0.024 ± 0.004 at MCR and 0.016 ± 0.003 at QMG) and highest for those marked with neckbands, regardless of neckband color (0.042 ± 0.005 at MCR and 0.035 ± 0.005 at QMG). Survival rates (±95% CL) were indistinguishable between geese marked with color and white neckbands (0.54 ± 0.08 at MCR and 0.52 ± 0.08 at QMG), but lower than those marked with standard legbands only (0.72 ± 0.17 at MCR and 0.83 ± 0.23 at QMG). Geese marked with white neckbands were recovered at rates similar to those marked with color neckbands, suggesting that hunter selection of color neckbands did not contribute greatly to lower survival rates in neckbanded geese. Rather, results suggest that neckbanded geese, regardless of neckband visibility, are more vulnerable to hunters than are geese marked only with legbands. © 2012 The Wildlife Society.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call