Abstract

PurposePosition accuracy of the multi‐leaf collimator (MLC) is essential in stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT). This study is aimed to investigate the dosimetric impacts of the MU‐weighted MLC positioning uncertainties of SBRT for patients with early stage peripheral non‐small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).MethodsThree types of MLC position error were simulated: Type 1, random error; Type 2, system shift, in which both MLC banks shifted to the left or right direction; and Type 3, in which both MLC banks moved with same magnitudes in the opposite directions. Two baseline plans were generated: an automatic plan (AP) and a manually optimized plan (MP). Multi‐leaf collimator position errors were introduced to generate simulated plans with the preset MLC leaf position errors, which were then reimported into the Pinnacle system to generate simulated plans, respectively. The dosimetric parameters (CI, nCI, GI, etc.) and gEUD values of PTV and OARs were calculated. Linear regression between MU‐weighted/unweighted MLC position error and gEUD was performed to obtain dose sensitivity.ResultsThe dose sensitivities of the PTVs were −4.93, −38.94, −41.70, −55.55, and 30.33 Gy/mm for random, left shift, right shift, system close, and system open MLC errors, respectively. There were significant differences between the MU‐weighted and the unweighted dose sensitivity, which was −38.94 Gy/mm vs −3.42 Gy/mm (left shift), −41.70 Gy/mm vs −3.56 Gy/mm (right shift), −55.55 Gy/mm vs −4.84 Gy/mm (system close), and 30.33 vs 2.64 Gy/mm (system open). For the system open/close MLC errors, as the PTV volume became larger, the dose sensitivity decreased. APs provided smaller dose sensitivity for the system shift and system close MLC errors compared to the conventional MPs.ConclusionsThere was significant difference in dose sensitivity between MU‐weighted and unweighted MLC position error of SBRT radiotherapy in peripheral NSCLC. MU is suggested to be included in the dosimetric evaluation of the MLC misalignments, since it is much closer to clinical radiotherapy.

Highlights

  • Lung cancer is one of the major malignant tumors with high morbidity and mortality in China and worldwide

  • The automatic planning systems can in principle achieve highly consistent treatment automatic plans (APs) in which the target coverage can be significantly improved at the little expense of planning time compared to manual plans (MPs).[8]

  • The aim of this study is to explore the effects of MU-weighted multi-leaf collimator (MLC) position error on dose distributions of stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) in APs for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), and compare with MPs

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Lung cancer is one of the major malignant tumors with high morbidity and mortality in China and worldwide. The incidence rate of lung cancer is steadily increasing.[1] With the advancement of radiotherapy, stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) has become an increasingly common treatment option for patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), with comparable clinical outcomes to surgery.[2,3,4] For patients with inoperable NSCLC, SBRT is often the critical alternative therapy. Stereotactic body radiotherapy demands much more stringent dose constraints to both the target volumes and critical normal tissues, which in turn requires a high-quality treatment plan, and efficient treatment planning process and technologies. APs automatically generate many artificial dose limiting structures and corresponding dose parameters,[9,10,11] which might increase the complexity of the plan

Objectives
Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call